Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 10:59:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A623547AEA39EA1775D4C73A885C4B86DF27B9DD1E63FABE82BA40CAA37CF1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion expressed by Rowling and others is about the use of the term “cis” in the context of genders, not about the scientific terms used in chemistry. The two terms are similar, but aren’t synonymous: https://dictionary.apa.org/cisgender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism?wprov=sfti1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671816817432576000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A623547AEA39EA1775D4C73A885C4B86DF27B9DD1E63FABE82BA40CAA37CF1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1687431574915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16718168174325760002A623547AEA39EA1775D4C73A885C4B86DF27B9DD1E63FABE82BA40CAA37CF1A