Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 22:35:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7A91A9ABF2137561A0F013EB59226EF8D1C91DC7039561E9B11391D4121F2D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note supports the original tweet, and is therefore not needed. Potential arguments about sample size or the usage of 'overwhelming' would be best made in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671785927813758980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7A91A9ABF2137561A0F013EB59226EF8D1C91DC7039561E9B11391D4121F2D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1687473334491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671785927813758980D7A91A9ABF2137561A0F013EB59226EF8D1C91DC7039561E9B11391D4121F2D3