Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 09:58:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA7E474BB5F374090A3F5D1AF9BAD1D5C873E7D8A7939FAEC0D006E97CF2D2EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note supports the original tweet, and is therefore not needed. Potential arguments about sample size or the usage of 'overwhelming' would be best made in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671785927813758980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA7E474BB5F374090A3F5D1AF9BAD1D5C873E7D8A7939FAEC0D006E97CF2D2EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1687427934169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671785927813758980CA7E474BB5F374090A3F5D1AF9BAD1D5C873E7D8A7939FAEC0D006E97CF2D2EF