Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 15:09:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9D02DC6A50E2C7BD2466BA3D01C3FDFD63A8970A5EA1B0521148E1FF2B912BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note supports the original tweet, and is therefore not needed. Potential arguments about sample size or the usage of 'overwhelming' would be best made in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671785927813758980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9D02DC6A50E2C7BD2466BA3D01C3FDFD63A8970A5EA1B0521148E1FF2B912BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1687446591658
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671785927813758980A9D02DC6A50E2C7BD2466BA3D01C3FDFD63A8970A5EA1B0521148E1FF2B912BF