Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-22 12:56:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F818F6F4D02EFFFC7C44F4857528A9E1F9D3C237CD2EE022811AA7361B3CECA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note supports the original tweet, and is therefore not needed. Potential arguments about sample size or the usage of 'overwhelming' would be best made in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671785927813758980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F818F6F4D02EFFFC7C44F4857528A9E1F9D3C237CD2EE022811AA7361B3CECA
  • createdAtMillis - 1687438592624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16717859278137589804F818F6F4D02EFFFC7C44F4857528A9E1F9D3C237CD2EE022811AA7361B3CECA