Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 19:22:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 99E1F5AFED5B83E5AAEFEBFB9AFCE4DB7718D49C2BBAE382526716F61E9C4B2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note talking about the etymological origin of the “cis/trans” prefix misses the point. An ideological belief that a person can be classed as the opposite sex is needed to make it make sense. Otherwise a “trans woman” would be a biological female who identifies as a man. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671542619686555650
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 99E1F5AFED5B83E5AAEFEBFB9AFCE4DB7718D49C2BBAE382526716F61E9C4B2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1687375360364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167154261968655565099E1F5AFED5B83E5AAEFEBFB9AFCE4DB7718D49C2BBAE382526716F61E9C4B2C