Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 10:20:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8A921FD317003B268BBAD623820FAB8F6C77E01A46C0C3B77AFC4E7348E3E41
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ironically, the note (above) which claims the chart is not misleading says the increase was ~12% to ~50%. This is incorrect; the increase was ~22% to ~50%. This does provide some evidence that the y-scale could mislead. However the tweet is factually correct so no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671421728462082048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8A921FD317003B268BBAD623820FAB8F6C77E01A46C0C3B77AFC4E7348E3E41
  • createdAtMillis - 1687342848038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671421728462082048C8A921FD317003B268BBAD623820FAB8F6C77E01A46C0C3B77AFC4E7348E3E41