Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 01:27:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B7E3E6A0D9AB8D00BD2080F5EA6BD84B7B93892927CFD65CE095DA36F7ADD8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ironically, the note (above) which claims the chart is not misleading says the increase was ~12% to ~50%. This is incorrect; the increase was ~22% to ~50%. This does provide some evidence that the y-scale could mislead. However the tweet is factually correct so no note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671421728462082048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B7E3E6A0D9AB8D00BD2080F5EA6BD84B7B93892927CFD65CE095DA36F7ADD8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723598829558
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16714217284620820480B7E3E6A0D9AB8D00BD2080F5EA6BD84B7B93892927CFD65CE095DA36F7ADD8D