Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-20 21:21:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP's continued promotion of the very insular world of peer review for publication is not the reflective of the tools used for scientific discussion. Even Nature points out and encourages at some level, other mechanisms for scientific discussion. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/peer-review#general-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671232349684547585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1687296086964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671232349684547585670D5BFC492F5BB296A7EFED4361AB4335E1CAE2886BAA7BD6D985437CB2A5D0