Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 00:22:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52444ED182AF63ADEF212951C27BAD9EFEAEC4681D71353F9E7EAEB5FF8AE681
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP's continued promotion of the very insular world of peer review for publication is not the reflective of the tools used for scientific discussion. Even Nature points out and encourages at some level, other mechanisms for scientific discussion. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/peer-review#general-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671232349684547585
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52444ED182AF63ADEF212951C27BAD9EFEAEC4681D71353F9E7EAEB5FF8AE681
  • createdAtMillis - 1687306920298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167123234968454758552444ED182AF63ADEF212951C27BAD9EFEAEC4681D71353F9E7EAEB5FF8AE681