Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 06:55:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8A0C4BF07B18D6BCF3969504905A8731BFF7A57DEC88AA03C680555754A9E3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

In 2017, Wikipedia stated that the Daily Mail was an unreliable source due to “its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate .. stories .. instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement and banned it as a source of information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671159016112943110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8A0C4BF07B18D6BCF3969504905A8731BFF7A57DEC88AA03C680555754A9E3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1687330528831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1671159016112943110E8A0C4BF07B18D6BCF3969504905A8731BFF7A57DEC88AA03C680555754A9E3A