Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-21 01:14:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F6D078ECFFCF804B04CAE1CE349430CB739581DF3FC579386FFEFF071FDD40F
Participant Details

Original Note:

In 2017, Wikipedia stated that the Daily Mail was an unreliable source due to “its printing of sensationalist and inaccurate .. stories .. instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement and banned it as a source of information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671159016112943110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F6D078ECFFCF804B04CAE1CE349430CB739581DF3FC579386FFEFF071FDD40F
  • createdAtMillis - 1687310064560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16711590161129431101F6D078ECFFCF804B04CAE1CE349430CB739581DF3FC579386FFEFF071FDD40F