Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-18 04:32:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8F9AC0DD759509743333C52F429B6C886BCE75C71FA197F932AD17E47E7878C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The scientific studies claiming to have found SARS-CoV-2 in samples taken before NOV 19 China, contain technical flaws, uncertainties in methodologies, and the lack of a credible review process (https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Declassified-Assessment-on-COVID-19-Origins.pdf)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670268251471855618
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8F9AC0DD759509743333C52F429B6C886BCE75C71FA197F932AD17E47E7878C
  • createdAtMillis - 1687062721566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1670268251471855618C8F9AC0DD759509743333C52F429B6C886BCE75C71FA197F932AD17E47E7878C