Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 12:18:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7F52DB6528B62E9F027ED6694808C53C65A34D2347FB664ED18703BEC1CB630
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst personal opinion from the op and the first alendment protecting the freesom of speech and ofthe press, it doesn't exonerate such press organs from the consequences of using such freesom when it goes too far and theredeontologicaly any organ of the press should be impartial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670002007439032322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7F52DB6528B62E9F027ED6694808C53C65A34D2347FB664ED18703BEC1CB630
  • createdAtMillis - 1687004318119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1670002007439032322B7F52DB6528B62E9F027ED6694808C53C65A34D2347FB664ED18703BEC1CB630