Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-20 22:14:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B559A4A61B62727C9C683A28B1761B51C1613D44EDEA2D84F111B492ECAF5570
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst personal opinion from the op and the first alendment protecting the freesom of speech and ofthe press, it doesn't exonerate such press organs from the consequences of using such freesom when it goes too far and theredeontologicaly any organ of the press should be impartial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670002007439032322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B559A4A61B62727C9C683A28B1761B51C1613D44EDEA2D84F111B492ECAF5570
  • createdAtMillis - 1687299246053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1670002007439032322B559A4A61B62727C9C683A28B1761B51C1613D44EDEA2D84F111B492ECAF5570