Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 12:09:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst personal opinion from the op and the first alendment protecting the freesom of speech and ofthe press, it doesn't exonerate such press organs from the consequences of using such freesom when it goes too far and theredeontologicaly any organ of the press should be impartial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670002007439032322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1687003786890
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16700020074390323226411705A5C55B5B105085C0A6DE362BCB800BF7BF59C0A3F855B1D4A8C60B0BE