Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 19:10:31 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C08A4438B2981DFB4F44C94C74B9AC2A38A7FB83750A2D9F6D6295F49E9FAA60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The community-note claim that this doesn't count as nuclear waste because it is contained completely disregards that all nuclear waste is contained after processing. The concept that nuclear waste is safe explicitly includes methods of handling and containment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669782521800798340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C08A4438B2981DFB4F44C94C74B9AC2A38A7FB83750A2D9F6D6295F49E9FAA60
  • createdAtMillis - 1686942631023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669782521800798340C08A4438B2981DFB4F44C94C74B9AC2A38A7FB83750A2D9F6D6295F49E9FAA60