Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 00:27:17 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AAC4AB94CDE5D00F58B9A1702C4C52F403C7DDB40C68D19A39E50610DE20ACE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The community-note claim that this doesn't count as nuclear waste because it is contained completely disregards that all nuclear waste is contained after processing. The concept that nuclear waste is safe explicitly includes methods of handling and containment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669782521800798340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AAC4AB94CDE5D00F58B9A1702C4C52F403C7DDB40C68D19A39E50610DE20ACE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1686961637225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669782521800798340AAC4AB94CDE5D00F58B9A1702C4C52F403C7DDB40C68D19A39E50610DE20ACE2