Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 07:08:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49724BC57C6BB007A3F1A0F4016324D8D271417E1BE3E993B2F1AAA3D09BE330
Participant Details

Original Note:

The community-note claim that this doesn't count as nuclear waste because it is contained completely disregards that all nuclear waste is contained after processing. The concept that nuclear waste is safe explicitly includes methods of handling and containment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669782521800798340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49724BC57C6BB007A3F1A0F4016324D8D271417E1BE3E993B2F1AAA3D09BE330
  • createdAtMillis - 1686985686527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166978252180079834049724BC57C6BB007A3F1A0F4016324D8D271417E1BE3E993B2F1AAA3D09BE330