Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 01:45:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F809481D11D13C3C4B1BC02C8E3986B3C0C522063B8B0F4E8A284856F6769F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The community-note claim that this doesn't count as nuclear waste because it is contained completely disregards that all nuclear waste is contained after processing. The concept that nuclear waste is safe explicitly includes methods of handling and containment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669782521800798340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F809481D11D13C3C4B1BC02C8E3986B3C0C522063B8B0F4E8A284856F6769F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1686966301058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16697825218007983400F809481D11D13C3C4B1BC02C8E3986B3C0C522063B8B0F4E8A284856F6769F8