Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-26 14:17:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25B87698064B877F210E7ED3331589273978A5F9B6527658ACCB0110A30103AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no proof ROGD exists, both papers proposing it have been retracted. No other researchers have found any evidence that it exists (eg https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(21)01085-4/fulltext ) Also autogynephilia as diagnosis that is not recognised by most of the medical establishment https://www.juliaserano.com/av/SeranoVeale22-autogynephilia-FEFs.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669752728032096263
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25B87698064B877F210E7ED3331589273978A5F9B6527658ACCB0110A30103AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1724681839384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166975272803209626325B87698064B877F210E7ED3331589273978A5F9B6527658ACCB0110A30103AB