Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 18:58:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2332020A52A07E53FC536CFC95BF9F020253B0F832483407459B0D268A54E9E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN! The article starts with "could be...", implying this is an opinion. Pitting one science study against another is something for the comments, not a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669695480484229120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2332020A52A07E53FC536CFC95BF9F020253B0F832483407459B0D268A54E9E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1686941914380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16696954804842291202332020A52A07E53FC536CFC95BF9F020253B0F832483407459B0D268A54E9E7