Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 15:48:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEC2722F71B00FE177E1CBB4C5EFC132F29BEF97D5EAD33D5BA02DE5254E64C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tweet is te beschouwen als clickbait, in het artikel staat immers zelf duidelijk wat de reden van de verwijdering van een vitrine is en dat de materialen daaruit weer terug zullen keren in de tentoongestelde collectie.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669648409660096512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEC2722F71B00FE177E1CBB4C5EFC132F29BEF97D5EAD33D5BA02DE5254E64C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1686930535258
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669648409660096512BEC2722F71B00FE177E1CBB4C5EFC132F29BEF97D5EAD33D5BA02DE5254E64C9