Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 17:39:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD1F18ACDE05D632B5DA5EE225A59BFBDF88FD82E5209D18DB1068A5D0E3F560
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tweet is te beschouwen als clickbait, in het artikel staat immers zelf duidelijk wat de reden van de verwijdering van een vitrine is en dat de materialen daaruit weer terug zullen keren in de tentoongestelde collectie.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669648409660096512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD1F18ACDE05D632B5DA5EE225A59BFBDF88FD82E5209D18DB1068A5D0E3F560
  • createdAtMillis - 1686937148532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1669648409660096512AD1F18ACDE05D632B5DA5EE225A59BFBDF88FD82E5209D18DB1068A5D0E3F560