Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 10:27:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E584FF70519CDDF44E5B3962D552409BFE2BDB5EE0546CD02C7067BD2C0C473
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tweet is te beschouwen als clickbait, in het artikel staat immers zelf duidelijk wat de reden van de verwijdering van een vitrine is en dat de materialen daaruit weer terug zullen keren in de tentoongestelde collectie.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669648409660096512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E584FF70519CDDF44E5B3962D552409BFE2BDB5EE0546CD02C7067BD2C0C473
  • createdAtMillis - 1686911272571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16696484096600965126E584FF70519CDDF44E5B3962D552409BFE2BDB5EE0546CD02C7067BD2C0C473