Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 19:38:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F7DABEB4692EE79E5138B82C19B79E645C59F3BE0D5119362A516BF5AA2F078
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tweet is te beschouwen als clickbait, in het artikel staat immers zelf duidelijk wat de reden van de verwijdering van een vitrine is en dat de materialen daaruit weer terug zullen keren in de tentoongestelde collectie.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669648409660096512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F7DABEB4692EE79E5138B82C19B79E645C59F3BE0D5119362A516BF5AA2F078
  • createdAtMillis - 1686944284784
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16696484096600965121F7DABEB4692EE79E5138B82C19B79E645C59F3BE0D5119362A516BF5AA2F078