Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 21:20:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CBECA346D8FBEE95C4E0E602353C59BFE3BCB2F3F414EBF1CB181F898141834
Participant Details

Original Note:

De tweet is te beschouwen als clickbait, in het artikel staat immers zelf duidelijk wat de reden van de verwijdering van een vitrine is en dat de materialen daaruit weer terug zullen keren in de tentoongestelde collectie.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669648409660096512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CBECA346D8FBEE95C4E0E602353C59BFE3BCB2F3F414EBF1CB181F898141834
  • createdAtMillis - 1686950400111
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16696484096600965120CBECA346D8FBEE95C4E0E602353C59BFE3BCB2F3F414EBF1CB181F898141834