Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 04:54:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8668C1F63E7BF6D91D0BFADB6E065E808B16DDEB81694A75EEB4A6A086ECC4A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Springer "retracted this article due to noncompliance with our editorial policies around consent. The participants of the survey have not provided written informed consent to participate in scholarly research or to have their responses published in a peer reviewed article" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669537330309525504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8668C1F63E7BF6D91D0BFADB6E065E808B16DDEB81694A75EEB4A6A086ECC4A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1686891267836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16695373303095255048668C1F63E7BF6D91D0BFADB6E065E808B16DDEB81694A75EEB4A6A086ECC4A0