Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 15:59:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Springer "retracted this article due to noncompliance with our editorial policies around consent. The participants of the survey have not provided written informed consent to participate in scholarly research or to have their responses published in a peer reviewed article" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669537330309525504
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C
  • createdAtMillis - 1686931151169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166953733030952550448AF0833F015D58345270CAE0146FD969133EAA4BF3E76AE9670BA9163DF111C