Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 12:54:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DC6C16C9180372C469076C47E63C02C211B0B5CD6B8C1A7448EF05A709F5163
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article was indeed retracted, and the journal's own description of the reason for retraction does not portray the whole story. https://www.city-journal.org/article/anatomy-of-a-scientific-scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669434890100830208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DC6C16C9180372C469076C47E63C02C211B0B5CD6B8C1A7448EF05A709F5163
  • createdAtMillis - 1686920050570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16694348901008302085DC6C16C9180372C469076C47E63C02C211B0B5CD6B8C1A7448EF05A709F5163