Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 08:50:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5093565BAB9DB5D14C8EC81B1BEE52F98D3D9F4CC12302A5C134B030F9B9AA4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article was indeed retracted, and the journal's own description of the reason for retraction does not portray the whole story. https://www.city-journal.org/article/anatomy-of-a-scientific-scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669434890100830208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5093565BAB9DB5D14C8EC81B1BEE52F98D3D9F4CC12302A5C134B030F9B9AA4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1686905418883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16694348901008302085093565BAB9DB5D14C8EC81B1BEE52F98D3D9F4CC12302A5C134B030F9B9AA4C