Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 20:30:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21404D9080FCECEC5E0E8AE58459CBA032869D35E245AB0ED82CB7E91DE288AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article was indeed retracted, and the journal's own description of the reason for retraction does not portray the whole story. https://www.city-journal.org/article/anatomy-of-a-scientific-scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669434890100830208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21404D9080FCECEC5E0E8AE58459CBA032869D35E245AB0ED82CB7E91DE288AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1686861037144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166943489010083020821404D9080FCECEC5E0E8AE58459CBA032869D35E245AB0ED82CB7E91DE288AF