Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 06:58:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F37DFD6030E9806A97E04A10C685230795C65975EDCE3C92251BA89F3FA98C46
Participant Details

Original Note:

ESG ratings have garnered criticism because of their lack of standardization and potential for greenwashing, issues that can be likened to "devilish" tactics in the business realm. Take a look at the Source for more information: ESG Ratings, Trust, and Greenwashing. https://www.knowesg.com/featured-article/esg-ratings-trust-and-greenwashing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669103070041481216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F37DFD6030E9806A97E04A10C685230795C65975EDCE3C92251BA89F3FA98C46
  • createdAtMillis - 1686812316073
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669103070041481216F37DFD6030E9806A97E04A10C685230795C65975EDCE3C92251BA89F3FA98C46