Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 13:20:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 659BA8E84863415A119531CFD3CE606BDFCC20B960346F232D042F8700FF5370
Participant Details

Original Note:

ESG ratings have garnered criticism because of their lack of standardization and potential for greenwashing, issues that can be likened to "devilish" tactics in the business realm. Take a look at the Source for more information: ESG Ratings, Trust, and Greenwashing. https://www.knowesg.com/featured-article/esg-ratings-trust-and-greenwashing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669103070041481216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 659BA8E84863415A119531CFD3CE606BDFCC20B960346F232D042F8700FF5370
  • createdAtMillis - 1686835243565
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1669103070041481216659BA8E84863415A119531CFD3CE606BDFCC20B960346F232D042F8700FF5370