Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 12:46:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
Participant Details

Original Note:

ESG ratings have garnered criticism because of their lack of standardization and potential for greenwashing, issues that can be likened to "devilish" tactics in the business realm. Take a look at the Source for more information: ESG Ratings, Trust, and Greenwashing. https://www.knowesg.com/featured-article/esg-ratings-trust-and-greenwashing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669103070041481216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857
  • createdAtMillis - 1686833218170
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16691030700414812162535A0B6F19ABEF00F83176C97CD11C211D11BF2FAB4ACEB342D63D94368E857