Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-15 14:01:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
Participant Details

Original Note:

ESG ratings have garnered criticism because of their lack of standardization and potential for greenwashing, issues that can be likened to "devilish" tactics in the business realm. Take a look at the Source for more information: ESG Ratings, Trust, and Greenwashing. https://www.knowesg.com/featured-article/esg-ratings-trust-and-greenwashing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1669103070041481216
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C
createdAtMillis - 1686837711761
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16691030700414812161B0CC438BCA3072E7E1FD5D62A78A721C4C386FCE1F210F06D23222DD997D49C