Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-14 14:30:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE97E16A478793EB29DA989FF4E017F82983FCC52C15E409058BC0C1FD870998
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the Tweet itself is surely questionable, there is no need and no way to disprove the OPs claims or add additional information.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668986639647948812
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE97E16A478793EB29DA989FF4E017F82983FCC52C15E409058BC0C1FD870998
  • createdAtMillis - 1686753036081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1668986639647948812EE97E16A478793EB29DA989FF4E017F82983FCC52C15E409058BC0C1FD870998