Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-28 01:16:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
Participant Details

Original Note:

Speaker is providing commentary on current events — a 1A right to express his interpretation of the events. No Note Needed. Claims that this commentary does need a note assumes the intended independence of the DOJ means 1 can’t question the possibility of DOJ corruption/bias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668959779383914500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
  • createdAtMillis - 1687914973939
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16689597793839145006BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98