Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-19 19:19:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D86DD35D8C4571D3C5EF5011E1B92F7CD54F155E5BE1C911B988B3543F6E301
Participant Details

Original Note:

Speaker is providing commentary on current events — a 1A right to express his interpretation of the events. No Note Needed. Claims that this commentary does need a note assumes the intended independence of the DOJ means 1 can’t question the possibility of DOJ corruption/bias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668959779383914500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D86DD35D8C4571D3C5EF5011E1B92F7CD54F155E5BE1C911B988B3543F6E301
  • createdAtMillis - 1687202365760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16689597793839145003D86DD35D8C4571D3C5EF5011E1B92F7CD54F155E5BE1C911B988B3543F6E301