Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-14 13:26:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 037698138E5B818ABA115021A429A7FCB5023536BD4CDF3C0191087FFCD3DECA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some notes claiming a poorly written Wikipedia post meant that this story is fake. However, the Sydney library has a well written article with a link to the newspaper archive that broke the story in 1935. https://dictionaryofsydney.org/entry/shark_arm_murder_1935

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668956846609293314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 037698138E5B818ABA115021A429A7FCB5023536BD4CDF3C0191087FFCD3DECA
  • createdAtMillis - 1686749205591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1668956846609293314037698138E5B818ABA115021A429A7FCB5023536BD4CDF3C0191087FFCD3DECA