Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-13 01:31:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F60C4E530700CEE35FD54B3DF6F36B7F5345393AE7F0956A4C5509A45A40868
Participant Details

Original Note:

Title aside, the article in the community note above challenges that the study in the original tweet isn't "peer reviewed" or published via a vehicle they find acceptable. Countering what you think is misinformation with more misinformation isn't the way to proceed here

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668380737412689926
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F60C4E530700CEE35FD54B3DF6F36B7F5345393AE7F0956A4C5509A45A40868
  • createdAtMillis - 1686619911052
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16683807374126899262F60C4E530700CEE35FD54B3DF6F36B7F5345393AE7F0956A4C5509A45A40868