Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-12 18:58:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F47E1282AB1F4106AFFFD2C92409AFCE636DA9BAA6FF2A78A69BAB5F0A76B37B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant in this case was over the twenty-four week limit imposed by the Abortion Act 1967. Provisions were made during the pandemic for practitioners to administer treatment up until ten weeks gestation without assessment. The 1861 act provides for all other circumstances

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668232401145790466
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F47E1282AB1F4106AFFFD2C92409AFCE636DA9BAA6FF2A78A69BAB5F0A76B37B
  • createdAtMillis - 1686596300681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1668232401145790466F47E1282AB1F4106AFFFD2C92409AFCE636DA9BAA6FF2A78A69BAB5F0A76B37B