Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-12 18:33:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C21674B11608DC1FCECDC14979E8D6834FEFF27BDE7EEA36239496A6060AE910
Participant Details

Original Note:

The defendant in this case was over the twenty-four week limit imposed by the Abortion Act 1967. Provisions were made during the pandemic for practitioners to administer treatment up until ten weeks gestation without assessment. The 1861 act provides for all other circumstances

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668232401145790466
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C21674B11608DC1FCECDC14979E8D6834FEFF27BDE7EEA36239496A6060AE910
  • createdAtMillis - 1686594830053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1668232401145790466C21674B11608DC1FCECDC14979E8D6834FEFF27BDE7EEA36239496A6060AE910