Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 17:14:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blatant misrepresentation of this article and the proposed law, which only pertains to insurance. It doesn’t require surrogacy from anyone. It states that insurance must cover all couples pursuing surrogacy, not just infertile straight couples. Source : the same article

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667917525970046976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89
  • createdAtMillis - 1686503688681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1667917525970046976AB29F0AE3235D18DDF039F1F4F7D7A22FEB50FFF9637AEBFE07DB73368591E89