Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-12 01:06:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BEAD7D7270C8BAD5AC12F0EB12B5DBD6D2A1D351695E8A16892526C6145F0E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blatant misrepresentation of this article and the proposed law, which only pertains to insurance. It doesn’t require surrogacy from anyone. It states that insurance must cover all couples pursuing surrogacy, not just infertile straight couples. Source : the same article

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667917525970046976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9BEAD7D7270C8BAD5AC12F0EB12B5DBD6D2A1D351695E8A16892526C6145F0E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1686532005029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16679175259700469769BEAD7D7270C8BAD5AC12F0EB12B5DBD6D2A1D351695E8A16892526C6145F0E4