Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 18:09:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83F673FFF5F22311B8F8078AB697755B6D8647C891085786E665E41F1D2B1FBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blatant misrepresentation of this article and the proposed law, which only pertains to insurance. It doesn’t require surrogacy from anyone. It states that insurance must cover all couples pursuing surrogacy, not just infertile straight couples. Source : the same article

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667917525970046976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83F673FFF5F22311B8F8078AB697755B6D8647C891085786E665E41F1D2B1FBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1686506981175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166791752597004697683F673FFF5F22311B8F8078AB697755B6D8647C891085786E665E41F1D2B1FBF