Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-12 15:46:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blatant misrepresentation of this article and the proposed law, which only pertains to insurance. It doesn’t require surrogacy from anyone. It states that insurance must cover all couples pursuing surrogacy, not just infertile straight couples. Source : the same article

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667917525970046976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10
  • createdAtMillis - 1686584762730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16679175259700469761D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10