Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 21:50:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E51BCF2C39CD5ED3A4C66D900018BF1F539A6DF3D96078E207BE088FC4714FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant, OP is not claiming that it was legal to keep the private server (and in fact disparages the act a few tweets later); they’re only stating a difference between the two cases which is a well-documented fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667789685999955968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E51BCF2C39CD5ED3A4C66D900018BF1F539A6DF3D96078E207BE088FC4714FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1686520255465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16677896859999559687E51BCF2C39CD5ED3A4C66D900018BF1F539A6DF3D96078E207BE088FC4714FC