Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-10 22:22:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BDA71962CE3197D4D726675D657A2F2AE4152AF173F9CAB34346CFEE0619984
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is literally just the article headline. Write a comment in the Washington Post's comment's section if you don't like the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667587925586894853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BDA71962CE3197D4D726675D657A2F2AE4152AF173F9CAB34346CFEE0619984
  • createdAtMillis - 1686435754649
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16675879255868948532BDA71962CE3197D4D726675D657A2F2AE4152AF173F9CAB34346CFEE0619984