Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-09 20:30:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4E05789B93A5A7CC01C5BED9F520471B45260EEC9FC4583AE8C622CA7054EB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The other note is missing the satirical part of the Tweet and should be relegated to the comments and not a fact-checking system.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667188175121580041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4E05789B93A5A7CC01C5BED9F520471B45260EEC9FC4583AE8C622CA7054EB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1686342616704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1667188175121580041B4E05789B93A5A7CC01C5BED9F520471B45260EEC9FC4583AE8C622CA7054EB9